webdevpuneet.com

Related Snippets

57 in Pricing category
35–40 of 57

Pricing Tier Recommender Quiz

Pricing Add-On Selector

Seat-Based Pricing Calculator

Pricing Card Currency Switcher

Flip Pricing Card

Pricing Feature Table

Pricing Tier Recommender Quiz — Free 3-Question Plan Picker (HTML/CSS/JS)

Pricing Tier Recommender Quiz · Pricing · Plain HTML, CSS & JS · Live preview

CategoryPricing
TagsE-CommerceGamesLanding Page

Copy & paste

Source Code

<div class="ptr-card">
  <div class="ptr-head">
    <div class="ptr-progress"><div class="ptr-progress-bar" id="ptrProgressBar"></div></div>
    <span class="ptr-step-label" id="ptrStepLabel">Question 1 of 3</span>
  </div>

  <div class="ptr-questions" id="ptrQuestions">
    <div class="ptr-q" data-q="0">
      <h3>How many people need access?</h3>
      <div class="ptr-options">
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="0" data-v="solo">Just me</button>
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="0" data-v="small">2&ndash;9 people</button>
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="0" data-v="large">10+ people</button>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="ptr-q" data-q="1" hidden>
      <h3>Do you need SSO or audit logs?</h3>
      <div class="ptr-options">
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="1" data-v="yes">Yes, required</button>
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="1" data-v="no">No, not needed</button>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="ptr-q" data-q="2" hidden>
      <h3>How many projects per month?</h3>
      <div class="ptr-options">
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="2" data-v="low">Under 5</button>
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="2" data-v="mid">5&ndash;30</button>
        <button type="button" class="ptr-opt" data-q="2" data-v="high">30+</button>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>

  <div class="ptr-result" id="ptrResult" hidden>
    <span class="ptr-result-tag">Recommended for you</span>
    <h3 id="ptrResultTier">Team</h3>
    <p id="ptrResultPrice">$79/mo</p>
    <p class="ptr-result-why" id="ptrResultWhy"></p>
    <button type="button" class="ptr-restart" id="ptrRestart">Start over</button>
  </div>
</div>

Extend with AI

Take This Snippet Further With AI

The AI prompt for this one is for Patreon supporters ($3 a month), along with a site with no ads. Supporters enter the passcode once and it is remembered in this browser.

· Become a supporter

What's included

Features

Real decision function
Ordered conditionals over real answers, not random or static.
Deterministic results
The same three answers always produce the same tier.
Explained recommendation
The why text names the specific answer that drove the pick.
One question at a time
Sequential reveal with a live progress bar and step count.
Single answers object
Every response accumulates in one object recommend() reads.
Clean restart
Resets answers and step index with no leftover state.
No fallthrough gaps
Every answer combination resolves to exactly one tier.
Framework-agnostic core
recommend() is pure and ports directly to any state model.

About this UI Snippet

Pricing Tier Recommender Quiz — Recommend a Plan From Real Answers, Not a Guess

Screenshot of the Pricing Tier Recommender Quiz snippet rendered live

A pricing page with four tiers asks visitors to self-diagnose which one fits — a task most people skip. This snippet replaces that guesswork with a three-question quiz that walks someone through team size, whether they need SSO or audit logs, and monthly project volume, then recommends one specific tier from a real decision function evaluated over their answers, not a random pick or a static default.

A pure decision function, not a lookup table

recommend(a) is a plain function that takes the collected { people, sso, projects } answers and returns a tier through ordered conditional checks: any SSO requirement or a 10+ person team forces Enterprise regardless of other answers; a 2–9 person team or 30+ projects a month lands on Team; mid-volume solo use lands on Pro; everything else falls through to Starter. Because it's a function over real input, the same three answers always produce the same tier — there's no randomness and no answer combination that falls through without a result.

One question at a time, with progress

Only one question is visible at once (.ptr-q[hidden] toggled by index), with a progress bar and a "Question X of 3" label that update as current advances. This keeps the quiz feeling short and sequential rather than presenting all three questions in a wall at once — the pattern that keeps completion rates high on real onboarding quizzes.

A reasoned result, not just a name

The result screen doesn't just name a tier — resultWhyEl states the specific reason, built inside recommend() itself, referencing whichever answer actually drove the decision ("SSO and audit logs are Enterprise-only" vs. "a 2–9 person team fits Team's shared workspace"). Explaining the *why* is what makes a recommendation feel earned rather than arbitrary, and it doubles as a preview of the tier's actual selling points.

Answers accumulate in one object

Every click writes into a single answers object keyed by question (people, sso, projects), so recommend() always evaluates the full, current answer set — restarting via the button simply resets that object and the step index, with no leftover state from a previous run.

Where it fits

Place it above a pricing card grid so the recommended tier can be highlighted, follow it with a plan selector to confirm the choice, or route an Enterprise result straight to an enterprise pricing contact flow.

Customizing it

Add more questions, change the tier thresholds, or have recommend() return a confidence score alongside the tier so borderline cases can show a runner-up option too.

Step by step

How to Use

  1. 1
    Paste HTML, CSS, and JSQuestion 1 of 3 renders with a progress bar at 0%.
  2. 2
    Answer each questionThe progress bar and step label advance after each click.
  3. 3
    See the recommendationrecommend() evaluates all three answers into one specific tier.
  4. 4
    Read the reasoningThe result explains which answer drove the recommendation.
  5. 5
    Try different pathsRestart and answer differently — the tier changes accordingly.
  6. 6
    Wire up real tiersEdit recommend() with your own thresholds and plan names.

Real-world uses

Common Use Cases

Pricing page guidance
Guide a confused visitor to the right plan with a three-question quiz covering team size, SSO need and project volume.
Sales-assisted routing
Route Enterprise answers straight to enterprise pricing, using ordered conditionals over real answers so results are deterministic.
Signup plan pre-selection
Pre-select a plan in a plan selector based on quiz results, with a why text naming the answer that drove the recommendation.
Feature discovery
Surface which tier unlocks SSO before the visitor commits, revealing one question at a time with a live progress bar and step count.
In-app upgrades and landing pages
Recommend an upgrade tier based on usage, or replace a static comparison with a quiz leading to a pricing card.
Related: Lifetime Deal Pricing Card
See the Lifetime Deal Pricing Card for a related pricing pattern worth pairing with this one.

Got questions?

Frequently Asked Questions

It's a pure function, recommend(a), that evaluates the three collected answers through ordered conditional checks — no randomness anywhere. Any SSO requirement or a 10+ person team always forces Enterprise; a 2\u20139 person team or 30+ monthly projects always lands on Team; mid-volume solo use always lands on Pro; everything else falls through to Starter. The same answers always produce the same result.

SSO is checked with priority — a.sso === 'yes' recommends Enterprise regardless of team size, because SSO and audit logs are gated to that tier in this quiz's logic. The why text explicitly states that reason rather than the team-size reason, so the explanation always matches the answer that actually mattered.

Yes. The conditional chain in recommend() is exhaustive: Enterprise catches large teams or SSO need, Team catches small teams or high project volume, Pro catches mid volume, and the final return is an unconditional Starter fallback. There's no answer combination that falls through without producing a tier.

A bare tier name feels arbitrary; stating the specific reason (built inside recommend() itself, referencing whichever answer triggered that branch) makes the recommendation feel earned and gives a preview of that tier's actual value, which is more persuasive than a plan name alone.

Move answers and current into component state, and call the same pure recommend(answers) function once the last question is answered — it needs no DOM access and returns a plain {tier, price, why} object you render directly. The step-progression and restart logic map to standard state updates.